- News
- Insights
- Bunkerworld .
- Energy traders, banks scramble to assess impact of Russian SWIFT ban
.
-
Jun 27
-
Jun 22
-
Jun 16
-
Jun 10
-
Jun 6
-
May 30
-
May 26
-
May 18
-
May 13
-
May 11
-
May 4
-
Apr 26
-
Apr 22
-
Apr 11
-
Apr 7
-
Apr 6
-
Mar 23
-
Mar 15
-
Mar 8
-
Feb 11
-
Feb 2
-
Feb 1
-
Jan 17
-
Dec 27
-
Dec 10
-
Dec 3
-
Nov 25
-
Nov 16
-
Oct 29
-
Oct 25
-
Oct 12
-
Oct 8
-
Oct 4
-
Sep 30
-
Sep 29
-
Sep 24
-
Sep 23
-
Sep 17
-
Sep 10
-
Sep 9
-
Sep 6
-
Sep 2
-
Aug 30
-
Aug 27
-
Aug 23
-
Aug 20
-
Aug 17
-
Aug 13
-
Aug 9
-
Aug 3
-
Jul 29
-
Jul 26
-
Jul 22
-
Jul 15
-
Jul 5
-
Jul 2
-
Jun 28
-
Jun 22
-
Jun 18
-
Jun 11
-
Jun 7
-
Jun 4
-
May 31
-
May 28
-
May 25
-
May 21
-
May 5
-
Apr 28
-
Apr 27
-
Apr 26
-
Apr 23
-
Apr 22
-
Apr 19
-
Apr 16
-
Apr 15
-
Apr 14
-
Apr 13
-
Apr 9
-
Apr 7
-
Apr 5
-
Mar 31
-
Mar 23
-
Mar 19
-
Mar 17
-
Mar 12
-
Mar 5
-
Mar 4
-
Mar 3
-
Mar 1
-
Feb 25
-
Feb 24
-
Feb 22
-
Feb 17
-
Feb 12
-
Feb 10
-
Feb 9
-
Feb 5
-
Feb 1
-
Jan 27
-
Jan 25
-
Jan 22
-
Jan 20
-
Jan 18
-
Jan 13
-
Jan 11
-
Jan 8
-
Jan 7
-
Jan 4
-
Dec 31
-
Dec 28
-
Dec 24
-
Dec 21
-
Dec 14
-
Dec 9
-
Dec 9
-
Dec 8
-
Dec 4
-
Dec 2
-
Dec 1
-
Nov 30
-
Nov 27
-
Nov 25
-
Nov 23
-
Nov 17
-
Nov 16
-
Nov 11
-
Nov 10
-
Nov 6
-
Nov 5
-
Nov 4
-
Nov 2
-
Oct 29
-
Oct 27
-
Oct 23
-
Oct 22
-
Oct 20
-
Oct 14
-
Oct 12
-
Oct 6
-
Oct 5
-
Sep 30
-
Sep 29
-
Sep 25
-
Sep 21
-
Sep 18
-
Sep 16
-
Sep 15
-
Sep 14
-
Sep 9
-
Sep 8
-
Sep 4
-
Sep 2
-
Aug 31
-
Aug 27
-
Aug 25
-
Aug 20
-
Aug 19
-
Aug 14
-
Aug 12
-
Aug 7
-
Aug 6
-
Aug 4
-
Jul 31
-
Jul 30
-
Jul 29
-
Jul 28
-
Jul 24
-
Jul 20
-
Jul 16
-
Jul 13
-
Jul 9
-
Jul 9
-
Jul 7
-
Jun 30
-
Jun 26
-
Jun 25
-
Jun 23
-
Jun 22
-
Jun 22
-
Jun 19
-
Jun 16
-
Jun 10
-
Jun 9
-
Jun 5
-
Jun 2
-
May 29
-
May 26
-
May 21
-
May 20
-
May 15
-
May 12
-
May 8
-
May 5
-
May 4
-
May 1
-
Apr 28
-
Apr 24
-
Apr 23
-
Apr 22
-
Apr 21
-
Apr 20
-
Apr 17
-
Apr 16
-
Apr 16
-
Apr 3
Commodity traders and banks are scrambling to assess the impact of swinging financial sanctions on Russia's key exports but most assume the curbs will continue to allow trading of oil and gas with Moscow, albeit with additional transactional costs.
US, Canada, and European allies announced sanctions on the Central Bank of Russia and the removal of some of the country's biggest financial institutions from the SWIFT global messaging system on Feb. 26, to hit Russia's ability to finance its military operation in Ukraine.
But the details of the SWIFT restrictions remain unclear as to whether the curbs will carve out certain energy-focused banks or use product definitions in the SWIFT system to permit energy-related transactions. The loss of access to SWIFT does not mean commodity trade payments are unviable, as SWIFT represents an interbank messaging rather than a complete financial transfer instrument, Japan's MUFG bank said.
"At face value, the exclusion of selected Russian banks from the SWIFT would create obstacles but not an absolute stop to commodity trades with Russia, in our view," MUFG bank said in a statement. "Central to this premise will be the reaction function of international banks in continuing banking transfers with non-sanctioned banks, as well as the restriction on the CBR's access to its foreign reserves."
As the market remains nervous about the growing risk of the scope of the new sanctions, the uncertainty has already tempered the appetite for financial commitments to buy Russian commodities.
Before the SWIFT sanction, Urals crude was assessed at its lowest level ever relative to Dated Brent on Feb. 24, but edged 7.5 cents/b higher on Feb. 25, amid a lack of indications during the Platts Market on Close assessment process.
"I would assume that they will have to look into ensuring that SWIFT still works for Russian oil and gas trades. Or at least this is something they will have to consider. Otherwise, it will be difficult to keep oil and gas flows out of the sanctions and flows will be disrupted even without direct sanctions on that sector," an Asian source, with previous experience in Russia oil and gas trades, told S&P Global Platts.
Slower payments
While uncertainty continues over the impact of the SWIFT access on potential disruptions to supplies of Russian oil and other commodities, the costs of sidestepping some Russian banks or other financial institutions will likely drive transactional costs much higher.
"Including SWIFT in the sanctions will make life more difficult -- not impossible though -- for those doing business with Russia. Transaction costs will be much higher and the process itself is complicated, but large commercial companies can find a way around it," said Carole Nakhle, CEO of Crystol Energy.
Traders may also use "sleeving" through a third party if necessary, although that involves a "sleeving" fee and additional financial risk. Russia has also trialed payments in alternative currencies and developed an alternative system to SWIFT.
The absence of SWIFT intermediation in commodity trades could mean slower payments and the rise in account receivables for Russian commodity exporters rather than major disruption to flows, MUFG said.
In recent years, Russia has also accelerated the use of its own SWIFT-like system for Transfer of Financial Messages (SPFS) messaging service, although it only operates domestically, leaving "vulnerability to frictions around cross-border transactions in other currencies," the bank said.
Commodity traders Glencore and Gunvor both declined to comment on the impact of the new sanctions on their transactional costs or trading operations. Rival independent traders Trafigura and Vitol did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
"It will likely make many buyers more hesitant to purchase Russian oil. That will tend to drive down the price of Russian crude oil even more until it ultimately clears outside of its traditional markets in Europe," said Rick Joswick, head of Global Oil Analytics at S&P Global Platts Analytics.
Bunkerworld .,